{"id":2939,"date":"2026-10-28T16:36:45","date_gmt":"2026-10-28T16:36:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/?post_type=publication&#038;p=2939"},"modified":"2026-10-28T16:36:45","modified_gmt":"2026-10-28T16:36:45","slug":"charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter","status":"publish","type":"publication","link":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\/","title":{"rendered":"Charges locatives et \u00e9galit\u00e9 devant la loi : irrecevabilit\u00e9 d\u2019une QPC \u2013 Jean-Pierre Blatter"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","class_list":["post-2939","publication","type-publication","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":{"pub_title":"Commercial leases","date_pub":"20190301","title_pub":"Charges locatives et \u00e9galit\u00e9 devant la loi : irrecevabilit\u00e9 d'une QPC","info_pub":"Commentaire de l'arr\u00eat de Cass. 3\u00e8me civ., 14 juin 2018, AJDI, mars 2019","description_pub":"While the question raised may be reworded by the court in order to clarify it or give it its correct legal characterisation, the court may not alter it. In such a case, the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation) must be regarded as duly seised and rules on whether to refer the priority preliminary ruling on constitutionality (QPC) as raised in the separate statement produced before the court which transmitted it.\r\n<br>\r\nUnder the guise of challenging the statutory provisions governing the temporal application of Article L. 145-40-2 of the Commercial Code, the question raised in reality seeks only to challenge the compatibility with the constitutional principle relied on of the provisions of the Decree of 3 November 2014 which exclude the application of Article R. 145-35 of the Commercial Code to existing leases. Those provisions, being regulatory in nature, cannot be the subject of a QPC.","link_page":"\/en\/competences\/","link_num":"05","link_title":"Time and stone in the field of leases"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Charges locatives et \u00e9galit\u00e9 devant la loi : irrecevabilit\u00e9 d\u2019une QPC \u2013 Jean-Pierre Blatter - Blatter Seynaeve<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While the question raised may be reworded by the court in order to clarify it or give it its correct legal characterisation, the court may not alter it. In such a case, the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation) must be regarded as duly seised and rules on whether to refer the priority preliminary ruling on constitutionality (QPC) as raised in the separate statement produced before the court which transmitted it. Under the guise of challenging the statutory provisions governing the temporal application of Article L. 145-40-2 of the Commercial Code, the question raised in reality seeks only to challenge the compatibility with the constitutional principle relied on of the provisions of the Decree of 3 November 2014 which exclude the application of Article R. 145-35 of the Commercial Code to existing leases. Those provisions, being regulatory in nature, cannot be the subject of a QPC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Charges locatives et \u00e9galit\u00e9 devant la loi : irrecevabilit\u00e9 d\u2019une QPC \u2013 Jean-Pierre Blatter - Blatter Seynaeve\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While the question raised may be reworded by the court in order to clarify it or give it its correct legal characterisation, the court may not alter it. In such a case, the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation) must be regarded as duly seised and rules on whether to refer the priority preliminary ruling on constitutionality (QPC) as raised in the separate statement produced before the court which transmitted it. Under the guise of challenging the statutory provisions governing the temporal application of Article L. 145-40-2 of the Commercial Code, the question raised in reality seeks only to challenge the compatibility with the constitutional principle relied on of the provisions of the Decree of 3 November 2014 which exclude the application of Article R. 145-35 of the Commercial Code to existing leases. Those provisions, being regulatory in nature, cannot be the subject of a QPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Blatter Seynaeve\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/blatter-seynaeve-partage.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/en\\\/publication\\\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/en\\\/publication\\\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\\\/\",\"name\":\"Charges locatives et \u00e9galit\u00e9 devant la loi : irrecevabilit\u00e9 d\u2019une QPC \u2013 Jean-Pierre Blatter - Blatter Seynaeve\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-28T16:36:45+00:00\",\"description\":\"While the question raised may be reworded by the court in order to clarify it or give it its correct legal characterisation, the court may not alter it. In such a case, the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation) must be regarded as duly seised and rules on whether to refer the priority preliminary ruling on constitutionality (QPC) as raised in the separate statement produced before the court which transmitted it. Under the guise of challenging the statutory provisions governing the temporal application of Article L. 145-40-2 of the Commercial Code, the question raised in reality seeks only to challenge the compatibility with the constitutional principle relied on of the provisions of the Decree of 3 November 2014 which exclude the application of Article R. 145-35 of the Commercial Code to existing leases. Those provisions, being regulatory in nature, cannot be the subject of a QPC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/en\\\/publication\\\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/en\\\/publication\\\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/en\\\/publication\\\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Charges locatives et \u00e9galit\u00e9 devant la loi : irrecevabilit\u00e9 d\u2019une QPC \u2013 Jean-Pierre Blatter\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Blatter Seynaeve\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Blatter Seynaeve\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/blatter-seynaeve-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/blatter-seynaeve-logo.png\",\"width\":800,\"height\":800,\"caption\":\"Blatter Seynaeve\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/blatter-seynaeve\\\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Charges locatives et \u00e9galit\u00e9 devant la loi : irrecevabilit\u00e9 d\u2019une QPC \u2013 Jean-Pierre Blatter - Blatter Seynaeve","description":"While the question raised may be reworded by the court in order to clarify it or give it its correct legal characterisation, the court may not alter it. In such a case, the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation) must be regarded as duly seised and rules on whether to refer the priority preliminary ruling on constitutionality (QPC) as raised in the separate statement produced before the court which transmitted it. Under the guise of challenging the statutory provisions governing the temporal application of Article L. 145-40-2 of the Commercial Code, the question raised in reality seeks only to challenge the compatibility with the constitutional principle relied on of the provisions of the Decree of 3 November 2014 which exclude the application of Article R. 145-35 of the Commercial Code to existing leases. Those provisions, being regulatory in nature, cannot be the subject of a QPC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Charges locatives et \u00e9galit\u00e9 devant la loi : irrecevabilit\u00e9 d\u2019une QPC \u2013 Jean-Pierre Blatter - Blatter Seynaeve","og_description":"While the question raised may be reworded by the court in order to clarify it or give it its correct legal characterisation, the court may not alter it. In such a case, the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation) must be regarded as duly seised and rules on whether to refer the priority preliminary ruling on constitutionality (QPC) as raised in the separate statement produced before the court which transmitted it. Under the guise of challenging the statutory provisions governing the temporal application of Article L. 145-40-2 of the Commercial Code, the question raised in reality seeks only to challenge the compatibility with the constitutional principle relied on of the provisions of the Decree of 3 November 2014 which exclude the application of Article R. 145-35 of the Commercial Code to existing leases. Those provisions, being regulatory in nature, cannot be the subject of a QPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\/","og_site_name":"Blatter Seynaeve","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/blatter-seynaeve-partage.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\/","url":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\/","name":"Charges locatives et \u00e9galit\u00e9 devant la loi : irrecevabilit\u00e9 d\u2019une QPC \u2013 Jean-Pierre Blatter - Blatter Seynaeve","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-10-28T16:36:45+00:00","description":"While the question raised may be reworded by the court in order to clarify it or give it its correct legal characterisation, the court may not alter it. In such a case, the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation) must be regarded as duly seised and rules on whether to refer the priority preliminary ruling on constitutionality (QPC) as raised in the separate statement produced before the court which transmitted it. Under the guise of challenging the statutory provisions governing the temporal application of Article L. 145-40-2 of the Commercial Code, the question raised in reality seeks only to challenge the compatibility with the constitutional principle relied on of the provisions of the Decree of 3 November 2014 which exclude the application of Article R. 145-35 of the Commercial Code to existing leases. Those provisions, being regulatory in nature, cannot be the subject of a QPC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/charges-locatives-et-egalite-devant-la-loi-irrecevabilite-dune-qpc-jean-pierre-blatter\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Charges locatives et \u00e9galit\u00e9 devant la loi : irrecevabilit\u00e9 d\u2019une QPC \u2013 Jean-Pierre Blatter"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/","name":"Blatter Seynaeve","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/#organization","name":"Blatter Seynaeve","url":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/blatter-seynaeve-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/blatter-seynaeve-logo.png","width":800,"height":800,"caption":"Blatter Seynaeve"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/blatter-seynaeve\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/2939","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publication"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2939"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}