{"id":2790,"date":"2026-10-28T16:34:40","date_gmt":"2026-10-28T16:34:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/?post_type=publication&p=2790"},"modified":"2026-10-28T16:34:40","modified_gmt":"2026-10-28T16:34:40","slug":"changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve","status":"publish","type":"publication","link":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\/","title":{"rendered":"Changement d\u2019usage : la preuve de l\u2019affectation \u00e0 usage d\u2019habitation au 1er janvier 1970 incombe \u00e0 l\u2019administration \u2013 Jean-Luc Seynaeve"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","class_list":["post-2790","publication","type-publication","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":{"pub_title":"Droit public immobilier","date_pub":"20200301","title_pub":"Changement d'usage : la preuve de l'affectation \u00e0 usage d'habitation au 1er janvier 1970 incombe \u00e0 l'administration","info_pub":"Commentaire de trois arr\u00eats de la Cour de cassation des 7 et 28 novembre 2019, AJDI mars 2020","description_pub":"The three judgments handed down by the Third Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation), the first on 7 November 2019 (No. 18-17.800) and the other two on 28 November 2019 (Nos. 18-23.769 and 18-24157) (on which see also G. Daudr\u00e9, AJDI 2020. 206), may reassure those who were concerned on reading the decision of the Conseil d'\u00c9tat of 5 April 2019 (CE, 5 avr. 2019, n\u00b0 410039, Lebon ; AJDA 2019. 787), which held that the mere finding that premises were allocated to a use other than residential use on 1 January 1970 is not sufficient to establish the lawfulness of that use under Article L. 631-7 of the Construction and Housing Code.\r\n\r\nIn the judgment of 7 November 2019 reported here, the Court of Cassation upholds the decision of the lower courts to dismiss the action brought by the City of Paris under Article L. 651-2 of the Construction and Housing Code, seeking an order requiring an owner and its tenant to restore to residential use a room in a building held in co-ownership, used as a storeroom and cold room for the restaurant on the ground floor, and to pay civil fines, on the ground that the City had not proved that the room had been allocated to residential use on 1 January 1970.","link_page":"\/en\/competences\/","link_num":"06","link_title":"Time and stone in the field of leases"},"yoast_head":"\nChangement d\u2019usage : la preuve de l\u2019affectation \u00e0 usage d\u2019habitation au 1er janvier 1970 incombe \u00e0 l\u2019administration \u2013 Jean-Luc Seynaeve - Blatter Seynaeve<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The three judgments handed down by the Third Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation), the first on 7 November 2019 (No. 18-17.800) and the other two on 28 November 2019 (Nos. 18-23.769 and 18-24157) (on which see also G. Daudr\u00e9, AJDI 2020. 206), may reassure those who were concerned on reading the decision of the Conseil d'\u00c9tat of 5 April 2019 (CE, 5 avr. 2019, n\u00b0 410039, Lebon ; AJDA 2019. 787), which held that the mere finding that premises were allocated to a use other than residential use on 1 January 1970 is not sufficient to establish the lawfulness of that use under Article L. 631-7 of the Construction and Housing Code. In the judgment of 7 November 2019 reported here, the Court of Cassation upholds the decision of the lower courts to dismiss the action brought by the City of Paris under Article L. 651-2 of the Construction and Housing Code, seeking an order requiring an owner and its tenant to restore to residential use a room in a building held in co-ownership, used as a storeroom and cold room for the restaurant on the ground floor, and to pay civil fines, on the ground that the City had not proved that the room had been allocated to residential use on 1 January 1970.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Changement d\u2019usage : la preuve de l\u2019affectation \u00e0 usage d\u2019habitation au 1er janvier 1970 incombe \u00e0 l\u2019administration \u2013 Jean-Luc Seynaeve - Blatter Seynaeve\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The three judgments handed down by the Third Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation), the first on 7 November 2019 (No. 18-17.800) and the other two on 28 November 2019 (Nos. 18-23.769 and 18-24157) (on which see also G. Daudr\u00e9, AJDI 2020. 206), may reassure those who were concerned on reading the decision of the Conseil d'\u00c9tat of 5 April 2019 (CE, 5 avr. 2019, n\u00b0 410039, Lebon ; AJDA 2019. 787), which held that the mere finding that premises were allocated to a use other than residential use on 1 January 1970 is not sufficient to establish the lawfulness of that use under Article L. 631-7 of the Construction and Housing Code. In the judgment of 7 November 2019 reported here, the Court of Cassation upholds the decision of the lower courts to dismiss the action brought by the City of Paris under Article L. 651-2 of the Construction and Housing Code, seeking an order requiring an owner and its tenant to restore to residential use a room in a building held in co-ownership, used as a storeroom and cold room for the restaurant on the ground floor, and to pay civil fines, on the ground that the City had not proved that the room had been allocated to residential use on 1 January 1970.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Blatter Seynaeve\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/blatter-seynaeve-partage.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/en\\\/publication\\\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/en\\\/publication\\\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\\\/\",\"name\":\"Changement d\u2019usage : la preuve de l\u2019affectation \u00e0 usage d\u2019habitation au 1er janvier 1970 incombe \u00e0 l\u2019administration \u2013 Jean-Luc Seynaeve - Blatter Seynaeve\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-28T16:34:40+00:00\",\"description\":\"The three judgments handed down by the Third Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation), the first on 7 November 2019 (No. 18-17.800) and the other two on 28 November 2019 (Nos. 18-23.769 and 18-24157) (on which see also G. Daudr\u00e9, AJDI 2020. 206), may reassure those who were concerned on reading the decision of the Conseil d'\u00c9tat of 5 April 2019 (CE, 5 avr. 2019, n\u00b0 410039, Lebon ; AJDA 2019. 787), which held that the mere finding that premises were allocated to a use other than residential use on 1 January 1970 is not sufficient to establish the lawfulness of that use under Article L. 631-7 of the Construction and Housing Code. In the judgment of 7 November 2019 reported here, the Court of Cassation upholds the decision of the lower courts to dismiss the action brought by the City of Paris under Article L. 651-2 of the Construction and Housing Code, seeking an order requiring an owner and its tenant to restore to residential use a room in a building held in co-ownership, used as a storeroom and cold room for the restaurant on the ground floor, and to pay civil fines, on the ground that the City had not proved that the room had been allocated to residential use on 1 January 1970.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/en\\\/publication\\\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/en\\\/publication\\\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/en\\\/publication\\\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Changement d\u2019usage : la preuve de l\u2019affectation \u00e0 usage d\u2019habitation au 1er janvier 1970 incombe \u00e0 l\u2019administration \u2013 Jean-Luc Seynaeve\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Blatter Seynaeve\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Blatter Seynaeve\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/blatter-seynaeve-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/blatter-seynaeve-logo.png\",\"width\":800,\"height\":800,\"caption\":\"Blatter Seynaeve\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blatter.fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/blatter-seynaeve\\\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Changement d\u2019usage : la preuve de l\u2019affectation \u00e0 usage d\u2019habitation au 1er janvier 1970 incombe \u00e0 l\u2019administration \u2013 Jean-Luc Seynaeve - Blatter Seynaeve","description":"The three judgments handed down by the Third Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation), the first on 7 November 2019 (No. 18-17.800) and the other two on 28 November 2019 (Nos. 18-23.769 and 18-24157) (on which see also G. Daudr\u00e9, AJDI 2020. 206), may reassure those who were concerned on reading the decision of the Conseil d'\u00c9tat of 5 April 2019 (CE, 5 avr. 2019, n\u00b0 410039, Lebon ; AJDA 2019. 787), which held that the mere finding that premises were allocated to a use other than residential use on 1 January 1970 is not sufficient to establish the lawfulness of that use under Article L. 631-7 of the Construction and Housing Code. In the judgment of 7 November 2019 reported here, the Court of Cassation upholds the decision of the lower courts to dismiss the action brought by the City of Paris under Article L. 651-2 of the Construction and Housing Code, seeking an order requiring an owner and its tenant to restore to residential use a room in a building held in co-ownership, used as a storeroom and cold room for the restaurant on the ground floor, and to pay civil fines, on the ground that the City had not proved that the room had been allocated to residential use on 1 January 1970.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Changement d\u2019usage : la preuve de l\u2019affectation \u00e0 usage d\u2019habitation au 1er janvier 1970 incombe \u00e0 l\u2019administration \u2013 Jean-Luc Seynaeve - Blatter Seynaeve","og_description":"The three judgments handed down by the Third Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation), the first on 7 November 2019 (No. 18-17.800) and the other two on 28 November 2019 (Nos. 18-23.769 and 18-24157) (on which see also G. Daudr\u00e9, AJDI 2020. 206), may reassure those who were concerned on reading the decision of the Conseil d'\u00c9tat of 5 April 2019 (CE, 5 avr. 2019, n\u00b0 410039, Lebon ; AJDA 2019. 787), which held that the mere finding that premises were allocated to a use other than residential use on 1 January 1970 is not sufficient to establish the lawfulness of that use under Article L. 631-7 of the Construction and Housing Code. In the judgment of 7 November 2019 reported here, the Court of Cassation upholds the decision of the lower courts to dismiss the action brought by the City of Paris under Article L. 651-2 of the Construction and Housing Code, seeking an order requiring an owner and its tenant to restore to residential use a room in a building held in co-ownership, used as a storeroom and cold room for the restaurant on the ground floor, and to pay civil fines, on the ground that the City had not proved that the room had been allocated to residential use on 1 January 1970.","og_url":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\/","og_site_name":"Blatter Seynaeve","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/blatter-seynaeve-partage.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\/","url":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\/","name":"Changement d\u2019usage : la preuve de l\u2019affectation \u00e0 usage d\u2019habitation au 1er janvier 1970 incombe \u00e0 l\u2019administration \u2013 Jean-Luc Seynaeve - Blatter Seynaeve","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-10-28T16:34:40+00:00","description":"The three judgments handed down by the Third Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation), the first on 7 November 2019 (No. 18-17.800) and the other two on 28 November 2019 (Nos. 18-23.769 and 18-24157) (on which see also G. Daudr\u00e9, AJDI 2020. 206), may reassure those who were concerned on reading the decision of the Conseil d'\u00c9tat of 5 April 2019 (CE, 5 avr. 2019, n\u00b0 410039, Lebon ; AJDA 2019. 787), which held that the mere finding that premises were allocated to a use other than residential use on 1 January 1970 is not sufficient to establish the lawfulness of that use under Article L. 631-7 of the Construction and Housing Code. In the judgment of 7 November 2019 reported here, the Court of Cassation upholds the decision of the lower courts to dismiss the action brought by the City of Paris under Article L. 651-2 of the Construction and Housing Code, seeking an order requiring an owner and its tenant to restore to residential use a room in a building held in co-ownership, used as a storeroom and cold room for the restaurant on the ground floor, and to pay civil fines, on the ground that the City had not proved that the room had been allocated to residential use on 1 January 1970.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/publication\/changement-dusage-la-preuve-de-laffectation-a-usage-dhabitation-au-1er-janvier-1970-incombe-a-ladministration-jean-luc-seynaeve\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Changement d\u2019usage : la preuve de l\u2019affectation \u00e0 usage d\u2019habitation au 1er janvier 1970 incombe \u00e0 l\u2019administration \u2013 Jean-Luc Seynaeve"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/","name":"Blatter Seynaeve","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/#organization","name":"Blatter Seynaeve","url":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/blatter-seynaeve-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/blatter-seynaeve-logo.png","width":800,"height":800,"caption":"Blatter Seynaeve"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/blatter-seynaeve\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/2790","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publication"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blatter.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2790"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}